<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ant's Eye View - Latest Comments in User Generated Help and How-to Content Model</title><link>http://antseyeview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://antseyeview.disqus.com/user_generated_help_and_how_to_content_model/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:51:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: User Generated Help and How-to Content Model</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/user-generated-help-and-how-to-content-model/#comment-7128261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree with the vacuum comment. I regularly hear/read/overhear stuff like "the blogosphere won't accept _____" or "conversation is an overused term". Fact is, within our circles these generalizations may be absolutely true. But just because *we* get it doesn't mean the rest of the world does. I'm excited that after 7+ years of doing this kind of work it's finally starting to get some traction, but it's FAR too early to call the race "finished".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Totally agree about the change in direct re: speaking. I've actually made the same point here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.communityguy.com/1243/2008-year-of-the-kick-ass/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.communityguy.com/1243/2008-year-of-the-kick-ass/"&gt;http://www.communityguy.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great minds and all... !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Generated Help and How-to Content Model</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/user-generated-help-and-how-to-content-model/#comment-7128260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://myITforum.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="myITforum.com"&gt;myITforum.com&lt;/a&gt; has been completely user-generated since it's inception.  It works well and continues to be a popular option.  It has become so popular that most folks visit &lt;a href="http://myITforum.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="myITforum.com"&gt;myITforum.com&lt;/a&gt; first, then Microsoft second.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod Trent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:28:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Generated Help and How-to Content Model</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/user-generated-help-and-how-to-content-model/#comment-7128259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Sean,&lt;br&gt;This is so right on the mark for our situation. We are in the process of considering options. Every day the forum moderators have a wealth of information that they share with the users in the product forums. And we also have the overly helpful users that know more about the products than ... So I agree, why not let them create resources.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My sister &amp;amp; I have already done this 'unofficially' on &lt;a href="http://www.Digiscrapinfo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.Digiscrapinfo.com"&gt;www.Digiscrapinfo.com&lt;/a&gt; where we have created FAQ's on topics that we were typing over &amp;amp; over. Those resources are frequently used &amp;amp; linked to from the 'official' product forum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've discussed it &amp;amp; the question is putting it into place. It's on my agenda. :) I'm glad to see that you'll be a good resource.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Connie Bensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>