<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ant's Eye View - Latest Comments in Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://antseyeview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://antseyeview.disqus.com/exploring_communities_and_corporate_hr8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:21:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/exploring-communities-and-corporate-hr/#comment-7127693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This topic of Management and leadership probably deserves a full post even though it's not core to my normal topic...I'll give this some thought and pull it up in the days/weeks ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for your insights.&lt;br&gt;sean&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean  ODriscoll</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:21:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/exploring-communities-and-corporate-hr/#comment-7127692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sean, well phrased: "[So I have some experience with the challenges of both management and leadership (two often misunderstood domains -- all too often thought of as the same thing)." Excellent! And so true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, some legal questions, but doing the right thing always prevails. And getting people engaged in the convo is always a winner. If anything else, we hear in HR surveys that people want to be respected and valued for what they do. The more we listen -- genuinely listen -- the better it works. And with tools to do it...all the better!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Roche</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/exploring-communities-and-corporate-hr/#comment-7127691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for joining the conversation here!  You make a great point.  I'm not an HR professional, but I do run a global team of about 100 people so I have some experience with the challenges of both management and leadership (two often mis-understood domains - all too often thought of as the same thing).  As the world shifts to a more inclusive / co-production set of processes, the role that a much larger set of employees can have in joining the conversation with customers will change the game in a number of ways. I think lowering that barrier for internal to external conversation (both ways) is an amazing tool for changing the perception people have about their work and customers have about your company - at the heart of the more transparent company - an earlier post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know the implications of this will bring new challenges from a legal and corporate policy standpoint for many organizations, but I think these will be good issues to address vs reasons not to engage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;sean&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean  ODriscoll</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/exploring-communities-and-corporate-hr/#comment-7127690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sean,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thought-provoking, indeed. There has been so much talk in the past few years about "human capital" and "employee engagement." I'm afraid a lot of that talk was just that: talk. There wasn't much of a conversation. Which is at the heart of why mission-driven work is so engaging and work-work sometimes isn't. Getting the conversation rolling, helping employees participate as much as customers in the refinement and success of a business, that works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Roche</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:46:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploring communities and corporate HR…</title><link>http://www.antseyeview.com/blog/business-strategy/exploring-communities-and-corporate-hr/#comment-7127688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Sean.&lt;br&gt;I like to see the assumptive close come up again.  About long term market advantage vs. market relevance - I think both are stake.  Lately I've often said that the basic rules of business have not changed - it's still focused on relationships with customers.  What has changed is customer's expectations of what it means to have a reationship with a business.  The businesses that succeed in co-production, co-development, etc. succeed because of the strength of these relationships and the willingness to pursue them.  I cannot think of a better long term market advantage than productive and trusting relationships with customers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee LeFever</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>